DISCLAIMER: Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
172456P.pdf 09/11/2019 Justin Anderson v. Wendy Kelley
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 17-2456
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Pine Bluff
[PUBLISHED] [Gruender, Author, with Stras and Kobes, Circuit Judges]
Prisoner case - Habeas - Death Penalty. The district court did not err in
rejecting Anderson's claim that his trial counsel ineffectively failed to
present or investigate certain mental health limitations, including
biological limitations of the teenage brain, PTSD from childhood abuse and
fetal alcohol syndrome; counsel's representation did not fall below an
objective standard of reasonableness, and even it if it did, Anderson has
not demonstrated prejudice; Anderson has failed to show prejudice from the
admission of mental health expert's report that included information that
he was on death row for a prior murder; with respect to Anderson's claims
that the trial court erroneously instructed the jury to consider an
improper aggravating factor, even if the court assumes the claim was
fairly presented in state court, it still fails because considering an
aggravating factor in violation of a state statute does not amount to a
constitutional violation meriting federal habeas relief; the tools were
available for Anderson to argue that his youth at the time of the offense
and serious mental health issues categorically exempted him from the death
penalty, and his failure to present such an argument in state court
resulted in the claim being procedurally defaulted. Judge Kobes,
concurring in part and dissenting in part.