DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

172530P.pdf   07/13/2018  United States  v.  John Edward Schostag
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  17-2530
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - St. Paul   
   [PUBLISHED] [Melloy, Author, with Shepherd and Grasz, Circuit Judges] 
   Criminal case - Sentencing. The district court did not err in modifying 
   the terms of defendant's supervised release to include a standard 
   condition explicitly prohibiting the use of medical marijuana; while some 
   medical marijuana is legal in Minnesota as a matter of state law, 
   Minnesota's law conflicts with federal law and federal law must prevail 
   under the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution; accordingly, the district 
   court had no discretion to permit defendant to use medical marijuana while 
   on supervised release.