172562P.pdf   12/28/2018  United States  v.  Bryan Reichel
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  17-2562
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis   
   [PUBLISHED] [Kelly, Author, with Shepherd and Stras, Circuit Judges] 
   Criminal case - Criminal law. The court did not err in denying defendant's 
   pretrial motion to sever wire fraud counts from bankruptcy fraud-related 
   counts because the offenses were all connected to a common scheme to 
   defraud defendant's investors, and the evidence of the wire fraud was 
   admissible as to the bankruptcy-related counts, and vice versa; evidence 
   was sufficient to support defendant's convictions on all counts as the 
   government proved defendant's fraudulent intent; the district court did 
   not abuse its discretion in denying defendant's post-trial motions to 
   continue sentence and dismiss the superseding indictment; the district 
   court did not err in imposing sentencing enhancements under Guidelines 
   Sec. 2B1.1(b)(1)(L) for amount of loss, Sec. 2B1.1(b)(10)(C) for 
   sophisticated means and Sec. 3B1.3 for abuse of a position of trust.