DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

172653P.pdf   07/26/2018  James Jensen  v.  MN Dept. of Human Services
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  17-2653
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis   
[PUBLISHED] [Kelly, Author, with Wollman and Arnold, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Civil rights. In this action by civilly committed individuals alleging the Minnesota Extended Treatment Options program's use of seclusion and restraints violated their Eighth Amendment rights, the district court correctly held that it retained jurisdiction over the matter to enforce the stipulated class action settlement agreement the parties reached in 2011; this court has jurisdiction over the defendants' appeal under the collateral order doctrine; the district court did not err in determining that, under Minnesota contract law, the jurisdictional provision of the settlement agreement was ambiguous; turning to extrinsic evidence to resolve the ambiguity, the court did not err in finding it supported an interpretation permitting the court to extend its jurisdiction as it "deems just and equitable."