DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

172698P.pdf   02/25/2019  Judith Wurster  v.  The Plastics Group
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  17-2698
   U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines   
[PUBLISHED] [Erickson, Author, with Loken and Melloy, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Products liability. In action alleging plaintiff's decedent was fatally injured as a result of a defect in defendant's gas can, the district court did not err in refusing to give plaintiff's proposed design defect instruction as, under Iowa law, the court may not instruct the jury on both negligence and strict liability; looking to the instructions as a whole, plaintiff's design defect claim was sufficiently presented to the jury; the court did not err in giving Iowa Civil Instruction 1000.4 on reasonable alternative design in conjunction with the instruction on design defect based on negligence as the instruction was necessary to provide the jury with the proper factors for conducting the risk-utility test required for design defect claims; no error in giving an assumption of risk instruction; the district court did not err in granting judgment as a matter of law for defendant on plaintiff's post-sale failure-to-warn claim as plaintiff failed to produce sufficient evidence to show defendant had a post-sale duty to warn consumers of the dangers posed by its gas can; without a direct relationship with the users of the gas can, defendant had no way of determining who purchased the cans and who should have been warned.