DISCLAIMER: The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
172698P.pdf 02/25/2019 Judith Wurster v. The Plastics Group
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 17-2698
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines
[PUBLISHED] [Erickson, Author, with Loken and Melloy, Circuit Judges]
Civil case - Products liability. In action alleging plaintiff's decedent
was fatally injured as a result of a defect in defendant's gas can, the
district court did not err in refusing to give plaintiff's proposed design
defect instruction as, under Iowa law, the court may not instruct the jury
on both negligence and strict liability; looking to the instructions as a
whole, plaintiff's design defect claim was sufficiently presented to the
jury; the court did not err in giving Iowa Civil Instruction 1000.4 on
reasonable alternative design in conjunction with the instruction on
design defect based on negligence as the instruction was necessary to
provide the jury with the proper factors for conducting the risk-utility
test required for design defect claims; no error in giving an assumption
of risk instruction; the district court did not err in granting judgment
as a matter of law for defendant on plaintiff's post-sale failure-to-warn
claim as plaintiff failed to produce sufficient evidence to show defendant
had a post-sale duty to warn consumers of the dangers posed by its gas
can; without a direct relationship with the users of the gas can,
defendant had no way of determining who purchased the cans and who should
have been warned.