DISCLAIMER: Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
172857P.pdf 01/10/2019 Shondel Church v. State of Missouri
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 17-2857
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Jefferson City
[PUBLISHED] [Benton, Author, with Gruender and Melloy, Circuit Judges]
Civil case - Class Actions. In this class action against the State and
governor of Missouri and the director and commissioners of the State
Public Defender Office alleging they were failing to meet their
constitutional obligation to provide indigent defendants with meaningful
representations by failing to adequately fund and staff the office,
Missouri did not waive its general state sovereignty by removing this
action from state to federal court; the court believes the Missouri
Supreme Court would apply long-established principles of sovereign
immunity to determine that the State was immune from cases involving
prospective equitable relief; neither the "consent" nor the "proprietary
function" exceptions to sovereign immunity applied; while Congress may
abrogate state sovereign immunity by providing an enforcement mechanism
for a constitutional violation, no such enforcement mechanism exists here;
the district court erred in denying the governor's motion for summary
judgment based on sovereign immunity; to the extent plaintiffs claim that
the governor's general enforcement authority and appointment authority are
non-legislative acts that lead to a constitutional violation, the governor
has sovereign immunity for those acts because they do not satisfy Ex Parte
Young; even if the governor's appropriation-reduction authority is not
shielded by sovereign immunity through Ex Parte Young, legislative
immunity forecloses suit against him.