DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

172857P.pdf   01/10/2019  Shondel Church  v.  State of Missouri
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  17-2857
   U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Jefferson City   
[PUBLISHED] [Benton, Author, with Gruender and Melloy, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Class Actions. In this class action against the State and governor of Missouri and the director and commissioners of the State Public Defender Office alleging they were failing to meet their constitutional obligation to provide indigent defendants with meaningful representations by failing to adequately fund and staff the office, Missouri did not waive its general state sovereignty by removing this action from state to federal court; the court believes the Missouri Supreme Court would apply long-established principles of sovereign immunity to determine that the State was immune from cases involving prospective equitable relief; neither the "consent" nor the "proprietary function" exceptions to sovereign immunity applied; while Congress may abrogate state sovereign immunity by providing an enforcement mechanism for a constitutional violation, no such enforcement mechanism exists here; the district court erred in denying the governor's motion for summary judgment based on sovereign immunity; to the extent plaintiffs claim that the governor's general enforcement authority and appointment authority are non-legislative acts that lead to a constitutional violation, the governor has sovereign immunity for those acts because they do not satisfy Ex Parte Young; even if the governor's appropriation-reduction authority is not shielded by sovereign immunity through Ex Parte Young, legislative immunity forecloses suit against him.