172951P.pdf   10/03/2019  United States  v.  Paris Hollingshed
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  17-2951
   U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Davenport   
   [PUBLISHED] [Smith, Author, with Loken and Gruender, Circuit Judges] 
   Criminal case - Criminal law and sentencing. Defendant's Rehaif issue 
   would be reviewed under the plain error standard and defendant could not 
   establish that any error affected his substantial rights or seriously 
   affected the integrity of the judicial proceedings in his case; assuming, 
   without deciding, that the district court plainly erred in admitting photo 
   identification evidence testimony from a police officer and that defendant 
   did not waive his Confrontation Clause rights, the admission of the 
   evidence did not affect defendant's substantial rights as the admissible 
   evidence in the case overwhelmingly established defendant possessed a 
   firearm; evidence was sufficient to support defendant's conviction for 
   being a felon in possession of a firearm; no error in imposing special 
   conditions of supervised release which require defendant to under anger 
   management counseling and domestic violence treatment.