173201P.pdf   07/18/2019  Mario Smith  v.  United States
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  17-3201
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis   
   [PUBLISHED] [Loken, Author, with Colloton and Kelly, Circuit Judges] 
   Prisoner case - Habeas. The district court properly applied the concurrent 
   sentence doctrine to find that while Smith was entitled to relief on his 
   ACCA felon-in-possession sentence, his career offender sentence on 
   possession of cocaine with intent to distribute was still valid under 
   Beckles; as the sentences on the two charges was the same length, no 
   reduction of Smith's sentence was required; Smith was not entitled to a 
   full resentencing under the sentencing package doctrine; claim that 
   appellate counsel provided constitutionally ineffective assistance of 
   counsel by failing to inform this court on direct appeal that Smith's 
   sentence might be affected by the Supreme Court's impending decision in 
   Johnson rejected. Judge Kelly, dissenting.