173207P.pdf   06/12/2019  Yasin Ahmed Farah  v.  Heather Weyker
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  17-3207
                          and No:  17-3208
                          and No:  17-3209
                          and No:  17-3210
                          and No:  17-3212
                          and No:  17-3213
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis   
   [PUBLISHED] [Stras, Author, with Colloton and Shepherd, Circuit Judge] 
   Civil case. In an action in which the plaintiffs alleged defendant, a 
   deputized U.S. Marshall, duped prosecutors and a grand jury into believing 
   plaintiffs were part of a multi-state sex-trafficking conspiracy, the 
   Constitution does not imply a cause of action under Bivens, and their 
   Bivens claims were properly dismissed; the matter must be remanded 
   however, to permit the district court to find whether plaintiffs have 
   stated claims under Section 1983; with respect to plaintiff Yassin's 
   claims that she was unlawfully arrested because defendant told another 
   police officer she was trying to intimidate a federal witness, defendant 
   was not entitled to qualified immunity as defendant's actions constituted 
   a violation of a clearly established right.