173236P.pdf   11/15/2018  United States  v.  Quentin Perry
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  17-3236
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - St. Paul   
   [PUBLISHED] [Benton, Author, with Kelly and Stras, Circuit Judges] 
   Criminal Case - conviction and sentence. District court did not clearly 
   err in denying motion to suppress bullets found in defendant's pockets as 
   there was probable cause to arrest him because defendant matched the 
   material aspects of the shooter's description and a reasonable officer 
   could have concluded that defendant was the shooter. Defendant's claim 
   that his constitutional rights to mount a defense were violated based on 
   his placement in segregation before and during trial fails on the merits. 
   The court did not abuse its discretion in limiting cross-examination or in 
   its evidentiary rulings. On challenge to sentence under the Armed Career 
   Criminal Act, district court did not err in determining that first-degree 
   aggravated robbery was a violent felony. The district court did not err in 
   treating the robbery and second-degree assault conviction as separate 
   predicate offenses for ACCA purposes, considering the time lapse between 
   offenses, the physical distance, and the different victims and 
   aggressions. The district court did not err in counting the felony 
   domestic assault as a violent felony. Judge Stras concurs. Judge Kelly 
   concurs in part and dissents in part.