173359P.pdf   12/10/2019  Richard Oslund  v.  United States
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  17-3359
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis   
   [PUBLISHED] [Wollman, Author, with Benton and Arnold, Circuit Judges] 
   Prisoner case - Section 2255. For the court's opinion in Oslund's direct 
   appeal, see U.S. v. Oslund, 453 F.3d 1048 (8th Cir. 2006). For his appeal 
   from the district court's order on his Section 2255, see Ostlund v. U.S., 
   751 F. App'x 961 (8th Cir. 2019). On remand, the district court did not 
   err in applying the concurrent sentence doctrine because even if relief on 
   his felon in possession conviction were granted under Johnson, the life 
   sentence on his murder conviction would not change; the district court was 
   not required to order a full resentencing. Judge Arnold, dissenting. 
  
173359U.pdf   02/08/2019  Richard Oslund  v.  United States
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  17-3359
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis   
   [UNPUBLISHED] [Per Curiam - Before Wollman, Arnold and Benton, Circuit 
   Judges] 
   Prisoner case - Habeas. Remanded for further proceeding to determine 
   whether Oslund has shown by a preponderance of the evidence that the 
   sentencing court relied on the residual clause to apply an ACCA 
   enhancement.