173406P.pdf   06/14/2019  Cheryl J. Schwandt  v.  Nancy A. Berryhill
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  17-3406
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis   
   [PUBLISHED] [Colloton, Author, with Shepherd and Stras, Circuit Judges] 
   Civil case - Social Security. The agency was justified in reopening 
   claimant's case based on new, material information which had a reasonable 
   probability of permitting claimant to retain certain contested benefits; 
   claimant had adequate notice that the reopened proceedings could result in 
   a determination that she was not disabled; claims that the agency was 
   barred from reconsidering the original benefits award by res judicata or 
   the "clean hands" doctrine rejected; the ALJ's determination that claimant 
   was not disabled from 2012 onward was supported by substantial evidence; 
   the ALJ did not err in rejecting certain medical evidence as not supported 
   by the record and did not err in discounting claimant's credibility; 
   statements of lay witnesses were not consistent with claimant's reported 
   daily activities, and the ALJ did not err in discounting them; the ALJ did 
   not err in determining that claimant could perform her past relevant work 
   as a dental hygienist; ALJ's statement of claimant's residual functional 
   capacity to the vocational expert comported with the evidence.