173447P.pdf   04/04/2019  Radiance Capital Receivables  v.  Matthew Concannon
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  17-3447
   U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Jefferson City   
   [PUBLISHED] [Wollman, Author, with Chief Judge Smith and Grasz, Circuit 
   Judges] 
   Civil Case - diversity. In action to collect consent judgment from 
   guarantor, the district court did not err in concluding the FDIC had 
   authority to assume defaulted bank's right to collect the debt, to sell 
   the failed bank's assets to a create a new entity and to assign debt to 
   Radiance who could enforce the debt; no clear error in finding guarantor's 
   agent delivered the guaranty with his implied actual authority, as 
   guarantor signed the guaranty, understood its contents and gave express 
   authority to conduct business; no error in finding bank did not fail in 
   its duty to ensure agent acted with implied actual authority; and no error 
   in rejecting guarantor's fraud in the factum defense.