173627P.pdf   02/19/2020  United States  v.  Houston Oliver
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  17-3627
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - St. Paul   
   [PUBLISHED] [Gruender, Author, with Smith, Chief Judge, and Loken, Circuit 
   Judge] 
   Criminal case - Criminal law. The district court did not err in denying 
   defendant's motion to dismiss the second indictment because dismissal of 
   the first indictment did not violate Fed. R. Crim. P. 48(a) or defendant's 
   due process rights; no error in denying defendant's motion to disclose the 
   identity of an informant or have the court conduct an in camera 
   examination regarding the informant; there was probable cause to search a 
   vehicle defendant was using to transport drugs; the affidavits submitted 
   in support of the motion to search a hotel room defendant had used 
   established probable cause for the issuance of the warrant, and the 
   warrant's language permitting seizure of "other media" was broad enough to 
   support seizure of cell phones found in the room; no error in denying 
   defendant's request for an instruction on accomplice testimony; evidence 
   was sufficient to support defendant's drug conspiracy conviction and the 
   jury's verdict was not against the weight of the evidence; defendant's 
   ineffective-assistance of counsel claim is not ripe for review.