DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

181059P.pdf   03/05/2019  Perfecto Martin Martin  v.  William P. Barr
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  18-1059
   Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals   
[PUBLISHED] [Loken, Author, with Melloy and Erickson, Circuit Judges] Petition for Review - Immigration. Petitioners' testimony failed to establish past persecution that rose to the level of protection; having failed to establish past persecution, petitioners are not entitled to a presumption of a well-founded fear of future persecution and must prove future fear that is both objectively and subjectively well-founded; the BIA did not err in finding that petitioners had failed to establish an objective nexus between fear of future persecution and a protected ground; the BIA did not err in determining there was insufficient proof that the harm inflicted on petitioners was because of their Mam ethnicity; claims of fear of future persecution by the Zetas was not related to a protected ground; having failed to establish eligibility for asylum, petitioners necessarily could not meet the more rigorous standards for withholding of removal or CAT relief.