DISCLAIMER: Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
181059P.pdf 03/05/2019 Perfecto Martin Martin v. William P. Barr
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 18-1059
Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
[PUBLISHED] [Loken, Author, with Melloy and Erickson, Circuit Judges]
Petition for Review - Immigration. Petitioners' testimony failed to
establish past persecution that rose to the level of protection; having
failed to establish past persecution, petitioners are not entitled to a
presumption of a well-founded fear of future persecution and must prove
future fear that is both objectively and subjectively well-founded; the
BIA did not err in finding that petitioners had failed to establish an
objective nexus between fear of future persecution and a protected ground;
the BIA did not err in determining there was insufficient proof that the
harm inflicted on petitioners was because of their Mam ethnicity; claims
of fear of future persecution by the Zetas was not related to a protected
ground; having failed to establish eligibility for asylum, petitioners
necessarily could not meet the more rigorous standards for withholding of
removal or CAT relief.