181071P.pdf   09/11/2019  United States  v.  Momodu Babu Sesay
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  18-1071
                          and No:  18-1979
                          and No:  18-3046
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - St. Paul   
   [PUBLISHED] [Colloton, Author, with Kelly and Erickson, Circuit Judges] 
   Criminal case - Criminal law and sentencing. Evidence was sufficient to 
   support defendants Sayonkon's and Samaan's convictions for conspiracy to 
   commit bank fraud, and there was no variance between the indictment for a 
   single conspiracy and the proof at trial; police search of a motel's guest 
   registry did not violate Samaan's Fourth Amendment rights as he had no 
   legitimate expectation of privacy in the identification card he provided 
   at registration; evidence was sufficient to support defendant Samaan's 
   conviction for aggravated identity theft; when an offender knowingly uses 
   a means of identification of another person, the phrase "another person," 
   includes both the living and the dead, and the government is not obligated 
   to prove the person whose identity was stolen was living; no error in 
   applying a leadership role enhancement in sentencing defendant Sayonkon; 
   the district court properly calculated the amount of loss for sentencing 
   defendant Samaan; defendant Sesay's below-guidelines sentence was not 
   substantively unreasonable.