DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

181352P.pdf   02/15/2019  Samiul Alim Lesum  v.  William P. Barr
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  18-1352
   Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals   
[PUBLISHED] [Shepherd, Author, with Wollman and Gruender, Circuit Judges] Petition for Review - Immigration. The IJ did not err in determining petitioner's asylum application was untimely and that it was not reasonable for petitioner to file the application more than six months late - see 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1158(a)(2)(D) which creates an exception for late filings made within a "reasonable period of time following expiration of lawful status;" petitioner abandoned most of his arguments that the discrimination he suffered in Bangladesh constituted persecution for purposes of withholding removal by failing to raise the issues before the BIA; with respect to the one incident he did raise, the record fails to show that the alleged acts rose to the level of persecution; further, petitioner did not contest to the BIA the IJ's denial of CAT relief, and that issue is also abandoned.