DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

181410P.pdf   07/30/2019  United States  v.  Hardy Kocher
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  18-1410
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - St. Paul   
   [PUBLISHED] [Loken, Author, with Colloton and Kelly, Circuit Judges] 
   Criminal case - Sentencing. Defendant's contention that the district court 
   found he committed the crime of viewing child pornography is directly 
   contradicted by the sentencing record; the district court did not commit 
   plain procedural error by basing its sentence on a fact not supported by 
   the record; the court adequately explained its sentencing decision, 
   adequately considered defendant's mitigation arguments and did not impose 
   an unduly harsh penalty.