DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

181503P.pdf   06/19/2019  United States  v.  Donald Thomas Perrin
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  18-1503
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - St. Paul   
[PUBLISHED] [Shepherd, Author, with Arnold and Erickson, Circuit Judges] Criminal case - Sentencing. Reviewed under the plain error standard, the district court's decision to impose a special condition that defendant not possess or use a computer or have access to any online service without prior approval of the Probation office did not involve a greater deprivation of liberty than was reasonably necessary, in that it was not a complete ban on Internet access and there was ample evidence that defendant used his devices for activities beyond simply possessing child pornography, including producing child pornography.