DISCLAIMER: Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
181864P.pdf 07/02/2018 In Re: Honorable John Kemp v.
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 18-1864
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock
[PUBLISHED] [Benton, Author, with Colloton and Kelly, Circuit Judges]
Petition for a Writ of Mandamus. In action by an Arkansas circuit court
judge challenging an Arkansas Supreme Court order immediately reassigning
the judge's death penalty and execution protocol cases, including any
future cases, as a violation of his constitutional and statutory rights,
the district court erred in denying the defendants' motion to dismiss;
plaintiff's free speech claim fails because he failed to allege he engaged
in a protected activity and because there is no adverse employment action;
with respect to plaintiff's Free Exercise Clause First Amendment claim, it
fails because nothing in the Arkansas Supreme Court's order affects his
right to practice his religion; even assuming the order substantially
burdens plaintiff's exercise of religion, his claim under the Arkansas
Religious Freedom Restoration Act claim fails because Arkansas has
compelling interests in the impartiality of the judiciary and in public
perception of an impartial judiciary; plaintiff does not allege any less
restrictive means of furthering these compelling interests and the
district court erred in allowing the claim to proceed; plaintiff alleged
no cognizable life, liberty or property claim and his due process claims
should have been dismissed for failure to state a claim; plaintiff failed
to properly plead an Equal Protection Clause argument as he failed to
allege he was treated differently than similarly situated persons or that
defendants had an intent to discriminate; plaintiff failed to state an
actionable civil conspiracy claim. Judge Kelly, dissenting.