DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

181864P.pdf   07/02/2018  In Re: Honorable John Kemp  v.  
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  18-1864
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock   
[PUBLISHED] [Benton, Author, with Colloton and Kelly, Circuit Judges] Petition for a Writ of Mandamus. In action by an Arkansas circuit court judge challenging an Arkansas Supreme Court order immediately reassigning the judge's death penalty and execution protocol cases, including any future cases, as a violation of his constitutional and statutory rights, the district court erred in denying the defendants' motion to dismiss; plaintiff's free speech claim fails because he failed to allege he engaged in a protected activity and because there is no adverse employment action; with respect to plaintiff's Free Exercise Clause First Amendment claim, it fails because nothing in the Arkansas Supreme Court's order affects his right to practice his religion; even assuming the order substantially burdens plaintiff's exercise of religion, his claim under the Arkansas Religious Freedom Restoration Act claim fails because Arkansas has compelling interests in the impartiality of the judiciary and in public perception of an impartial judiciary; plaintiff does not allege any less restrictive means of furthering these compelling interests and the district court erred in allowing the claim to proceed; plaintiff alleged no cognizable life, liberty or property claim and his due process claims should have been dismissed for failure to state a claim; plaintiff failed to properly plead an Equal Protection Clause argument as he failed to allege he was treated differently than similarly situated persons or that defendants had an intent to discriminate; plaintiff failed to state an actionable civil conspiracy claim. Judge Kelly, dissenting.