DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

181910P.pdf   07/26/2019  Robert Paul Dols  v.  Andrew M. Saul
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  18-1910
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis   
   [PUBLISHED] [Gruender, Author, with Colloton and Erickson, Circuit Judges] 
   Civil case - Social Security. Substantial evidence supported the ALJ's 
   determination that claimant did not meet or equal a listed impairment; 
   while the ALJ could have weighed the evidence differently, substantial 
   evidence supported the ALJ's determination that the psychological expert's 
   opinion should be given weight over claimant's counselor's observations as 
   a non-medical, other source. Judge Erickson, dissenting