DISCLAIMER: The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
181959P.pdf 02/12/2020 Walmart, Inc. v. Cuker Interactive, LLC
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 18-1959
and No: 182081
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - Fayetteville
[PUBLISHED] [Erickson, Author, with Smith, Chief Judge, and Beam, Circuit
Judge]
Civil case - Contracts. The evidence in the record supports the jury's
finding that defendant took reasonable steps to protect only one of its
alleged trade secrets and because it failed to take reasonable steps to
protect the other three alleged trade secrets at issue, that information
was not subject to protection under the Arkansas Trade Secrets Act; with
respect to the protected trade secret, evidence in the record established
Walmart used improper means to acquire defendant's Adobe Source Files and
that it did so willfully and maliciously; the district court did not err
in reducing the jury's award of damages on this claim because defendant
failed to establish proximate cause; Walmart's claim that it received a
perpetual and irrevocable license to use the Adobe Source File materials
is without merit; the district court properly instructed the jury on
material breach of contract and the record supported the jury's finding
that Walmart's acts, hindrances or delays excused defendant's performance;
there was sufficient evidence Walmart engaged in intentional wrongdoing,
such as to avoid the liability cap in the contract; jury verdict for
defendant on claim of unjust-enrichment affirmed; it was permissible under
the Arkansas Trade Secrets Act for the district court to enter an
injunction requiring to Walmart to delete the Adobe Source Files in its
possession; the district court did not err in denying Walmart's motion for
a new trial based on claims of juror bias, improper evidentiary rulings
and an improper jury instruction defining malice.