DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

182172P.pdf   04/10/2020  Napoli Shkolnik PLLC  v.  Bridgette Trice
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  18-2172
                          and No:  18-2174
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis   
   [PUBLISHED] [Kelly, Author, with Colloton and Beam, Circuit Judges] 
   Civil case - Attorneys' fees. The district court did not err in 
   determining that the plaintiff law firm was not owed any part of the 
   contingency fees in the case under a quantum meruit theory; the firm's 
   actions while lead counsel did not benefit the clients and it actually 
   harmed them by failing to meet critical discovery and expert disclosure 
   deadlines in the underlying litigation.