DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

182221P.pdf   07/22/2019  United States  v.  Scott Harry
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  18-2221
   U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Dubuque   
   [PUBLISHED] [Smith, Author, with Wollman and Kobes, Circuit Judges] 
   Criminal case - Criminal law. Dog sniff of defendant's truck was supported 
   by reasonable suspicion and did not impermissibly extend the traffic stop; 
   no error in admitting prior bad acts evidence under Rule 404(b) as the 
   evidence served the legitimate non-propensity purpose of proving knowledge 
   and intent; in any event, any error in admitting the evidence was harmless 
   in light of the strength of the government's case; the district court did 
   not err in refusing to admit certain bad acts evidence against defendant's 
   passenger on the ground that it was too remote in time.