DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

182349P.pdf   08/13/2019  Travis Raymond  v.  United States
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  18-2349
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis   
   [PUBLISHED] {Kelly, Author, with Loken and Erickson, Circuit Judges] 
   Prisoner case - Habeas. The error in Raymond's sentence was a 
   constitutional one since the district court determined that the sentence 
   imposed on his firearm count was based on the ACCA's unconstitutionally 
   vague residual clause; the mere fact that the district court could have 
   imposed the same term of imprisonment without the ACCA enhancement does 
   not make the error harmless; the sentencing error identified by the 
   district court would prejudice Raymond, entitling him to relief under 
   Section 2255; the matter is remanded to the district court for further 
   consideration under Quarles v. U.S., 139 S. Ct. 1872 (2019 and, if 
   necessary, consideration of other factors affecting the court's Rule 
   60(b)(6) ruling in the matter.