DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

182494P.pdf   12/09/2019  Albert Rinchuso  v.  Brookshire Grocery Company
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  18-2494
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Pine Bluff   
   [PUBLISHED] [Erickson, Author, with Smith, Chief Judge, and Wollman, 
   Circuit Judge] 
   Civil case - Employment discrimination. Assuming for the purposes of 
   argument that plaintiff's claims of direct evidence of discrimination are 
   true, none of the purported direct evidence established the required 
   specific link between his conduct and gender-based animus; plaintiff also 
   failed to establish a prima facie case of disparate treatment as he did 
   not proffer specific, tangible evidence that the employee to whom he 
   compared himself was similarly situated; any error in denying plaintiff's 
   Rule 59(e) motion was harmless.