DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

182658P.pdf   05/20/2020  Lawn Managers, Inc.  v.  Progressive Lawn Managers, Inc
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  18-2658
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis   
[PUBLISHED] [Kelly, Author, with Smith, Chief Judge, and Kobes, Circuit Judge] Civil case - Trademarks. The parties' agreement giving Progressive a time-limited use of the Lawn Managers' mark was not a naked license agreement, and Lawn Managers did not abandon its mark by granting the license in the unique circumstances presented; in these circumstances, Lawn Managers could reasonably rely on Progressive to meet the same standards of service that Lawn Managers provided its customers; the district court did not err in rejecting Progressive's unclean hands defense, as Lawn Managers was permitted under the parties' licensing agreement and other related agreements to send a "We Want You Back" mailer to former customers awarded to Progressive under the licensing agreement; the district court did not clearly err in its damages award. Judge Kobes, dissenting.