DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

182700P.pdf   12/17/2019  United States  v.  Kyle Leick
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  18-2700
   U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Dubuque   
   [PUBLISHED] [Colloton, Author, with Loken and Kobes, Circuit Judges] 
   Criminal case - Criminal law. The record shows that the warrant for a 
   urine sample from defendant was supported by probable cause when it was 
   executed; the district court permissibly relied on expert testimony that 
   evidence of marijuana use can be present in a user's system for up to two 
   months; based on this and testimony that defendant used the drug every 
   day, there was a fair probability that a urine sample collected 8 days 
   after the issuance of the warrant would reveal evidence of drug use on or 
   before the date the warrant was issued.