DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

182776P.pdf   04/22/2019  Dina Klein  v.  Credico Inc.
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  18-2776
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - St. Paul   
   [PUBLISHED] [Gruender, Author, with Benton and Grasz, Circuit Judges] 
   Civil case - Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. Use of an abbreviation 
   for defendant's other registered name and the phrase "Professional Debt 
   Collectors" in correspondence was not false, misleading or deceptive and 
   plaintiff failed to plead sufficient factual matter to state a plausible 
   claim defendant violated the Act; inclusion of a non-licensed signatory in 
   the signature block did not violate the Act as the other two signatories 
   were licensed, as was defendant; the district court properly concluded 
   Minnesota law does not prohibit defendant from seeking pre-judgment 
   interest.