DISCLAIMER: The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
182800P.pdf 08/11/2020 United States v. Howard Ross, III
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 18-2800
and No: 18-2877
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City
[PUBLISHED] [Colloton, Author, with Smith, Chief Judge, and Stras, Circuit
Judge]
Criminal case - Criminal law and sentencing. The evidence was sufficient
to support defendants' convictions for carjacking and kidnapping that
ended in felony murder - a violation of U.S.C. Sec. 2119 constitutes a
crime of violence under 18 U.S.C. Sec. 924(c), and the defendants were
properly convicted under Sec. 924(j) of causing death through use of a
firearm in the course of carjacking; evidence was sufficient to support
defendant Ross's conviction for kidnapping, for carjacking resulting in
death, for using a firearm in furtherance of a carjacking resulting in
felony murder, and for being a felon in possession of a firearm; no error
in admitting a text between defendants suggesting they commit a robbery as
it proves an agreement to commit the charged offenses; no error in
refusing to give defendant Ross's proposed instruction on eyewitness
testimony or defendant King's proposed instruction on the defense of
duress; the requirement of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 924(c)(1)(D) that a life
sentence for using a firearm must run consecutive to mandatory life terms
for other offenses in not an Eighth Amendment violation; defendant King's
argument that his sentence is substantively unreasonable because he was
less culpable than defendant Ross rejected. Judge Stras, concurring in the
judgment and dissenting in part.