DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

182800P.pdf   08/11/2020  United States  v.  Howard Ross, III
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  18-2800
                          and No:  18-2877
   U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City   
[PUBLISHED] [Colloton, Author, with Smith, Chief Judge, and Stras, Circuit Judge] Criminal case - Criminal law and sentencing. The evidence was sufficient to support defendants' convictions for carjacking and kidnapping that ended in felony murder - a violation of U.S.C. Sec. 2119 constitutes a crime of violence under 18 U.S.C. Sec. 924(c), and the defendants were properly convicted under Sec. 924(j) of causing death through use of a firearm in the course of carjacking; evidence was sufficient to support defendant Ross's conviction for kidnapping, for carjacking resulting in death, for using a firearm in furtherance of a carjacking resulting in felony murder, and for being a felon in possession of a firearm; no error in admitting a text between defendants suggesting they commit a robbery as it proves an agreement to commit the charged offenses; no error in refusing to give defendant Ross's proposed instruction on eyewitness testimony or defendant King's proposed instruction on the defense of duress; the requirement of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 924(c)(1)(D) that a life sentence for using a firearm must run consecutive to mandatory life terms for other offenses in not an Eighth Amendment violation; defendant King's argument that his sentence is substantively unreasonable because he was less culpable than defendant Ross rejected. Judge Stras, concurring in the judgment and dissenting in part.