DISCLAIMER: Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
182810P.pdf 04/06/2020 United States v. Marcell Shavers
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 18-2810
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City
[PUBLISHED] [Shepherd, Author, with Grasz and Kobes, Circuit Judges]
Criminal case - Criminal law and sentencing. There was sufficient evidence
from which a reasonable jury could find defendant knew of, agreed to and
intended to participate in his co-conspirator's plan to possess
methamphetamine with intent to distribute; the jury could infer the
co-conspirator's intent to distribute the drug from the quantity involved,
his prior conduct and the fact the co-conspirator did not use the drug;
the evidence showed defendant was a participant in the drug deal and was
not merely present; claim jury instructions constructively amended or
varied from the superseding indictment rejected; the district court did
not err in refusing to give buyer-seller and mere-presence instructions;
testimony that defendant and his co-conspirator knew each other in prison
and that the co-conspirator had helped defendant was properly admitted to
show their prior relationship and explain why defendant would help him;
the district court did not err in applying the murder cross-reference in
Guidelines Sec. 2D1.1(d)(1)where the court concluded at sentencing that
the preponderance of the evidence showed defendant shot and killed a man
during the drug deal; defendant's sentence was not substantively
unreasonable.