DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

182810P.pdf   04/06/2020  United States  v.  Marcell Shavers
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  18-2810
   U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City   
[PUBLISHED] [Shepherd, Author, with Grasz and Kobes, Circuit Judges] Criminal case - Criminal law and sentencing. There was sufficient evidence from which a reasonable jury could find defendant knew of, agreed to and intended to participate in his co-conspirator's plan to possess methamphetamine with intent to distribute; the jury could infer the co-conspirator's intent to distribute the drug from the quantity involved, his prior conduct and the fact the co-conspirator did not use the drug; the evidence showed defendant was a participant in the drug deal and was not merely present; claim jury instructions constructively amended or varied from the superseding indictment rejected; the district court did not err in refusing to give buyer-seller and mere-presence instructions; testimony that defendant and his co-conspirator knew each other in prison and that the co-conspirator had helped defendant was properly admitted to show their prior relationship and explain why defendant would help him; the district court did not err in applying the murder cross-reference in Guidelines Sec. 2D1.1(d)(1)where the court concluded at sentencing that the preponderance of the evidence showed defendant shot and killed a man during the drug deal; defendant's sentence was not substantively unreasonable.