183049P.pdf   08/05/2019  United States  v.  Nico Daniels
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  18-3049
   U.S. District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - Hot Springs   
   [PUBLISHED] [Erickson, Author, with Colloton and Gruender, Circuit Judges] 
   Criminal Case - Conviction. The district court did not abuse its 
   discretion in denying motion in limine to exclude admission of statements 
   Daniels made a his state parole revocation hearing relating to possession 
   of a firearm; he voluntarily testified after being advised of his right to 
   counsel and right to remain silent, and that his statements could be used 
   against him and there were no other dangers of unfair prejudice. District 
   court did not abuse its discretion in granting government's motion in 
   limine to exclude passenger's prior conviction; any error was harmless 
   because Daniels admitted his own possession. District court's denial of 
   his motion to suppress statements made prior to receiving Miranda warnings 
   were also harmless error in light of other admissions.