DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

183081P.pdf   02/05/2020  United States  v.  Carstie Clausen
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  18-3081
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota   
[PUBLISHED] [Loken, Author, with Shepherd and Stras, Circuit Judges] Criminal case - Restitution. The district court did not err in requiring defendant to pay $19,619 in restitution to repair the damage he caused when he shot into a Customs and Border Protection helicopter that was flying over his property; the district court properly deferred its restitution order until the defense could examine certain documents and decide whether to challenge the government's evidence on the extent of the damaged and cost of repairs; the district court did not abuse its discretion by granting an extension of time to finally determine the amount of restitution because the extension did not prejudice defendant's ability to challenge the claim; the district court did not err in determining the government had adequately documented the extent of the damage and cost of repairs.