DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

183230P.pdf   12/13/2019  David McConnell  v.  Anixter, Inc.
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  18-3230
   U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska - Lincoln   
   [PUBLISHED] [Gruender, Author, with Kelly and Erickson, Circuit Judges] 
   Civil case - Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act. 
   Certain condescending and disparaging remarks about plaintiff's military 
   service were not actionable under the USERRA; order to perform some manual 
   labor did not exceed plaintiff's disability restriction and was not 
   materially adverse; denial of request to use a service dog was not 
   sufficiently adverse to be actionable; the burden is on plaintiff to show 
   his military status was a motivating factor in defendant's decision to 
   terminate him and plaintiff failed to present sufficient evidence to make 
   a threshold showing that his status was a motivating factor in his 
   termination.