DISCLAIMER: The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
183444P.pdf 03/02/2020 D. L. v. St. Louis City School District
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 18-3444
and No: 18-3497
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis
[PUBLISHED] [Erickson, Author, with Melloy and Kobes, Circuit Judges]
Civil case - Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. The District's
jurisdictional challenge was without merit because the student was
enrolled in the City School District at the time the complaint was filed,
had not yet enrolled in a private school setting and his parents had
provided the school with notice; plaintiff sought compensation for past
obligations, rather than prospective relief, and his claims were not moot
because he no longer resided in the District; district court's
misstatement of the burden of proof was immaterial as it merely
incorrectly described a past proceeding and the court properly placed the
burden of proof and applied the correct standard of review in the
proceeding pending before it; the district court did not err in
determining the District had denied plaintiff and Free Appropriate Public
Education when it placed him at a school without direct occupational
therapy or a sensory diet plan to address his autism-related issues; the
district court erred in limiting its tuition reimbursement award based on
improvements the District had made to plaintiff's school as those
improvements were not communicated to plaintiff's parents; the limitation
of tuition reimbursement is reversed and the matter is remanded with
directions to award plaintiff full reimbursement for his attendance at a
private school.