DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

183444P.pdf   03/02/2020  D. L.  v.  St. Louis City School District
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  18-3444
                          and No:  18-3497
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis   
[PUBLISHED] [Erickson, Author, with Melloy and Kobes, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. The District's jurisdictional challenge was without merit because the student was enrolled in the City School District at the time the complaint was filed, had not yet enrolled in a private school setting and his parents had provided the school with notice; plaintiff sought compensation for past obligations, rather than prospective relief, and his claims were not moot because he no longer resided in the District; district court's misstatement of the burden of proof was immaterial as it merely incorrectly described a past proceeding and the court properly placed the burden of proof and applied the correct standard of review in the proceeding pending before it; the district court did not err in determining the District had denied plaintiff and Free Appropriate Public Education when it placed him at a school without direct occupational therapy or a sensory diet plan to address his autism-related issues; the district court erred in limiting its tuition reimbursement award based on improvements the District had made to plaintiff's school as those improvements were not communicated to plaintiff's parents; the limitation of tuition reimbursement is reversed and the matter is remanded with directions to award plaintiff full reimbursement for his attendance at a private school.