DISCLAIMER: Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
183553P.pdf 08/17/2021 Louis Gareis v. 3M Company
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 18-3553
and No: 18-3580
U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota
[PUBLISHED] [Gruender, Author, with Kelly and Grasz, Circuit Judges]
Civil case - Bair Hugger Forced Air Warming Devices Products Liability
Litigation. The district court did not abuse its discretion in excluding
evidence of 3M's knowledge of the risk and utility of the Bair Hudgger
device at the time the device used in plaintiff's surgery left 3M's
control; the district court did not abuse its discretion by excluding
evidence of reasonable design alternatives to the Bair Hugger besides a
product called TableGard; the district court did not abuse its discretion
in admitting evidence from 3M's expert concerning operating room air-flow;
the district court did not err in granting 3M summary judgment on
plaintiffs' failure-to-warn claim asserted under both negligence and
strict-liability theories.