DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

183618P.pdf   04/03/2020  Ahmed Kassim  v.  William P. Barr
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  18-3618
   Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals   
[PUBLISHED] [Stras, Author, with Smith, Chief Judge, and Grasz, Circuit Judges] Petition for Review - Immigration. The court had jurisdiction to review petitioner's arguments as to whether the BIA applied the proper standard of review to his claims for a waiver of inadmissibility and deferral of removal, and the criminal-alien bar did not preclude review; in reversing the IJ's decision to grant a waiver of inadmissibility, the BIA did not supplant the IJ's hardship finding with one of its own; instead, it accepted the hardship finding as a given and went on to review the discretionary decision to grant the waiver de novo; further proceedings are required on petitioner's request for deferral of removal under the Convention Against Torture as the IJ's decision is missing a finding that petitioner would be more likely than not to suffer torture if returned to Somalia; the matter is remanded for further proceedings on this issue. Judge Grasz, dissenting in part.