DISCLAIMER: Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
183618P.pdf 04/03/2020 Ahmed Kassim v. William P. Barr
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 18-3618
Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
[PUBLISHED] [Stras, Author, with Smith, Chief Judge, and Grasz, Circuit
Judges]
Petition for Review - Immigration. The court had jurisdiction to review
petitioner's arguments as to whether the BIA applied the proper standard
of review to his claims for a waiver of inadmissibility and deferral of
removal, and the criminal-alien bar did not preclude review; in reversing
the IJ's decision to grant a waiver of inadmissibility, the BIA did not
supplant the IJ's hardship finding with one of its own; instead, it
accepted the hardship finding as a given and went on to review the
discretionary decision to grant the waiver de novo; further proceedings
are required on petitioner's request for deferral of removal under the
Convention Against Torture as the IJ's decision is missing a finding that
petitioner would be more likely than not to suffer torture if returned to
Somalia; the matter is remanded for further proceedings on this issue.
Judge Grasz, dissenting in part.