DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

183734P.pdf   04/01/2020  United States  v.  Paul Winnick
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  18-3734
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota   
   [PUBLISHED] [Stras, Author, with Smith, Chief Judge, and Grasz, Circuit 
   Judges] 
   Criminal case - Sentencing. Remanded to permit the district court to 
   clarify its reasoning regarding credit for related state charges under 
   Guidelines Sec. 5G1.3; defendant's other arguments concerning his sentence 
   are rejected, as the district court did not err in imposing an enhancement 
   under Guidelines Sec. 4B1.5(b) for engaging in a pattern of sexual 
   exploitation; the court considered defendant's mitigating 3553(a) factors 
   in setting its sentence and that is all he is entitled to; in light of the 
   remand, addressing the reasonableness of defendant's sentence would be 
   premature.