DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

183743P.pdf   07/13/2020  Amee Pribyl  v.  County of Wright
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  18-3743
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota   
   [PUBLISHED] [Kelly, Author, with Loken and Benton, Circuit Judges] 
   Civil case - Employment discrimination. In the absence of direct evidence 
   of gender-based discrimination in defendant's decision not to promote 
   plaintiff, the court would apply the McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting 
   framework; as the defendant concedes the plaintiff made a prima facie 
   case, the issue is whether defendant's proffered non-discriminatory reason 
   for its decision - plaintiff's interview - was a pretext for 
   discrimination; plaintiff failed to meet her burden to show pretext and 
   the district court did not err in rejecting her cat's-paw theory.