DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

186001P.pdf   10/18/2018  Steven Conway  v.  Richard Heyl
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  18-6001
   U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis   
   [PUBLISHED] [Saladino, Chief Judge, Author, with Dow and Sanberg, 
   Bankrupty Judges] 
   Bankruptcy Appellant Panel - Discharge under 11 U.S.C. sec. 523(a)(19). 
   After Steven Conway lost money in real estate development scheme managed 
   by debtor, he filed a complaint with the Enforcement Division of the 
   Missouri Securities Division of the Secretary of State, which resulted in 
   a Consent Order requiring debtor to pay a fine and costs. Conway's 
   subsequent adversary proceeding, asserting the debt owed him was excepted 
   from discharge under section 523(a)(19), was properly dismissed by the 
   bankruptcy court, as of the debt at issue did not "result . . .from" the 
   Consent Order. Conway was not a party to or signatory on the Consent Order 
   and the debt to Conway did not result from the Consent Order.