DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

191160P.pdf   06/04/2020  United States  v.  Roman Harlan
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  19-1160
   U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha   
   [PUBLISHED] [Benton, Author, with Loken and Kelly, Circuit Judges] 
   Criminal case - Criminal law and sentencing. The magistrate judge did not 
   abuse her discretion in denying defendant's pre-trial motion for 
   substitute counsel as defendant did not show justifiable dissatisfaction 
   with his attorney; Speedy Trial Act argument rejected as the magistrate 
   judge did not abuse her discretion in granting defendant's counsel's 
   request for a continuance or in excluding the extended time from the 
   Speedy Trial Act calculation; the district court did not err in denying 
   defendant's mid-trial request to proceed pro se; within-guidelines 
   sentence was not an abuse of the district court's discretion.