DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

191169P.pdf   07/09/2020  Thomas Hilliard  v.  Andrew Saul
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  19-1169
   U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines   
   [PUBLISHED] [Benton, Author, with Colloton and Wollman, Circuit Judges] 
   Civil case - Social Security. The ALJ did not err in weighing the opinions 
   of the medical professionals; sufficient evidence in the record supported 
   the ALJ's decision, including clinical notes on claimant's mobility; the 
   hypothetical question posed to the vocational expert adequately described 
   claimant's cognitive limitations, including the concrete consequences of 
   claimant's impairments; claimant's Appointments Clause challenge was not 
   raised to the ALJ and would not be considered.