DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

191180P.pdf   08/05/2021  Nancy Axline  v.  3M Company
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  19-1180
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota   
   [PUBLISHED] [Gruender, Author, with Kelly and Grasz, Circuit Judges] 
   Civil case - Products Liability - Bair Hugger Forced Air Warming Devices 
   Products Liability Litigation. The district court did not err in 
   determining the law of Ohio, the place where plaintiff was injured, 
   governs this case; nor did the court err in granting 3M judgment on the 
   pleadings based on its determination that plaintiff had failed to plead 
   actionable claims under Ohio products liability law; nor did the district 
   court err in denying plaintiff leave to amend her claims based on her 
   failure to comply with the local rules governing amendments;dismissal with 
   prejudice affirmed.