DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

191269P.pdf   06/03/2020  ISD No. 283  v.  E.M.D.H., a minor
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  19-1269
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota   
[PUBLISHED] [Erickson, Author, with Grasz and Kobes, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. The district court's refusal to allow the school district to supplement the record with information regarding the student's performance since the ALJ's decision was not an abuse of the district court's discretion; the district court did not err in finding defendant had failed to provide the student with the full and sufficiently comprehensive evaluation required by the IDEA and Minnesota law; the record established the student was eligible for special education and a state-funded FAPE; the ALJ and the district court did not err in concluding the school district had breached its obligation to identify the student by the spring of her eighth-grade year as a child eligible for special education; the district court did not err in finding plaintiffs were entitled to recover the costs associated with comprehensive psychological evaluation, educational evaluation and private educational services; the court erred in determining plaintiffs were not entitled to an award of compensatory education in the form of private tutoring until the student earns the credits expected of her same-age peers.