DISCLAIMER: The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
191340P.pdf 08/25/2021 United States v. Arkansas Department of Educ.
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 19-1340
and No: 19-1342
and No: 19-1348
and No: 19-1349
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - El Dorado
[PUBLISHED] [Per Curiam - Before Erickson, Melloy and Kobes, Circuit
Judges]
Civil case - School Desegregation. Four Arkansas school district sought
modification of decades-old desegregation orders so that they could be
exempt from newly passed amendments to the Arkansas school choice law. The
district court granted the motions and modified the desegregation orders
to explicitly limit the transfer of students between school districts; the
State appealed the modifications, and this court affirmed; the State
sought rehearing and the U.S., participating in the case for the first
time, asked the court to reconsider the matter; additional briefing was
then permitted. Held: The district court erred in finding that the repeal
of Arkansas's 1989 school choice act and the subsequent adoption of the
2017 amendments to a 2015 act significantly changed Arkansas law in a
manner allowing for modification of the consent decrees; because no
vestige of discrimination traces back to interdistrict school transfers,
the district court abused its discretion in expanding the consent decrees
to prohibit such transfers. Judge Melloy, dissenting.
191340P.pdf 12/31/2020 United States v. Arkansas Department of Educ.
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 19-1340
and No: 19-1342
and No: 19-1348
and No: 19-1349
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - El Dorado
[PUBLISHED] [Erickson, Author, with Melloy and Kobes, Circuit Judges]
Civil case - School Desegregation. Certain Arkansas school districts
sought modification of existing school desegregation consent decrees to
allow their exemption from Arkansas's Public School Choice Act; the
district court granted the motions and modified the consent decrees to
explicitly limit the transfer of students between districts; the Arkansas
Department of Education appealed, alleging the modifications imposed an
impermissible interdistrict remedy. Held: because there was a substantial
change in Arkansas law and the circumstances in the districts (white
flight) after the consent decrees were enacted and because the district
court's modification was not an impermissible interdistrict remedy, the
district court's order is affirmed. Judge Kobes, dissenting.