DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

191361P.pdf   02/08/2021  Stephanie Ideus  v.  Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  19-1361
   U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska - Lincoln   
[PUBLISHED] [Stras, Author, with Wollman and Kelly, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Products liability. Plaintiff brought this products liability action against the manufacturer of the intrauterine device which which broke in her uterus, and the district court granted the manufacturer's motion for summary judgment. Held: under Nebraska law, the manufacturer did not have a duty to warn plaintiff directly about the potential risks of using the device and the district court properly granted the manufacturer's motion for summary judgment; in this situation, Nebraska would apply the learned-intermediary doctrine, and there is no dispute that the manufacturer provided adequate warnings to plaintiff's physician; Nebraska would not apply an exception to the doctrine for prescription contraceptives, including IUDs. Judge Kelly, dissenting.