191465P.pdf   06/12/2020  United States  v.  Grant Cramer
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  19-1465
   U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Council Bluffs   
   [PUBLISHED] [Loken, Author, with Smith, Chief Judge, and Gruender, Circuit 
   Judge] 
   Criminal case - Sentencing. Defendant's argument that the court based his 
   sentence on clearly erroneous fact findings was raised for the first time 
   on appeal, and the argument was not preserved for appellate review; in any 
   event, the argument is without merit as considerable evidence supported 
   the district court's finding that defendant knowingly distributed child 
   pornography; the district court did not err in weighing the 3553(a) 
   factors, and defendant's sentence was not substantively unreasonable; six 
   special conditions of supervision may be ones routinely imposed in sex 
   offender and child pornography cases, but the record established that they 
   were reasonably related to defendant's offense and his history and 
   characteristics and that they were needed to protect the public from a 
   dangerous child sexual predator.