DISCLAIMER: Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
191563P.pdf 07/23/2020 United States v. Robert Ivers
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 19-1563
U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota
[PUBLISHED] [Shepherd, Author, with Smith, Chief Judge, and Melloy,
Circuit Judge]
Criminal case - Criminal law. The threat statements defendant made to
attorneys assigned to assist him in a pro se referral program for civil
litigation were not protected by the attorney-client privilege as threats
to commit violent acts against the alleged victims are not communications
made in order to obtain legal advice; the evidence was sufficient for a
jury to find that defendant made a true threat of future violence against
the federal judge who had ruled in his civil suit; no error in the
instructions given on counts of threatening to murder a federal judge or
interstate transmission of a threat to injure - see U.S. v. Wynn, 827 F.3d
778 (8th Cir. 2016);cumulative error argument rejected.