DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

191563P.pdf   07/23/2020  United States  v.  Robert Ivers
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  19-1563
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota   
[PUBLISHED] [Shepherd, Author, with Smith, Chief Judge, and Melloy, Circuit Judge] Criminal case - Criminal law. The threat statements defendant made to attorneys assigned to assist him in a pro se referral program for civil litigation were not protected by the attorney-client privilege as threats to commit violent acts against the alleged victims are not communications made in order to obtain legal advice; the evidence was sufficient for a jury to find that defendant made a true threat of future violence against the federal judge who had ruled in his civil suit; no error in the instructions given on counts of threatening to murder a federal judge or interstate transmission of a threat to injure - see U.S. v. Wynn, 827 F.3d 778 (8th Cir. 2016);cumulative error argument rejected.