DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

191620P.pdf   07/24/2020  United States  v.  Jamaal Mays
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  19-1620
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota   
   [PUBLISHED] [Loken, Author, with Benton and Kelly, Circuit Judges] 
   Criminal case - Sentencing. The injuries suffered by a bystander when 
   defendant engaged in a shoot-out with a cellphone store employee at the 
   store he was trying to rob fell between bodily injury and serious bodily 
   injury and supported a three-level increase under Guidelines Sec. 
   2B3.1(b)(3)(D); Application Note 4 did not preclude a victim injury 
   increase under Sec. 2B3.1(b)(3); defendant's below-guidelines range Hobbs 
   Act sentence was not substantively unreasonable.