DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

191693P.pdf   04/15/2020  United States  v.  Ricardo Saucedo
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  19-1693
   U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Davenport   
   [PUBLISHED] [Shepherd, Author, with Colloton and Erickson, Circuit Judges] 
   Criminal case - Criminal law. Speedy Trial Act claim rejected; even 
   assuming there is a "ruse" exception to the Act, it would not apply in 
   this case as the facts showed no ruse occurred; no error in ruling on the 
   motion without an evidentiary hearing; in this prosecution for illegal 
   reentry, petitioner failed to exhaust his administrative remedies and is 
   barred from collaterally attacking the underlying removal order in the 
   case; argument that defendant was excused from his failure to exhaust 
   rejected.